ad info

 
CNN.com Allpoliticsallpolitics.comwith TIME
 
 

 

  Search
 
 

 
POLITICS
TOP STORIES

Analysis indicates many Gore votes thrown out in Florida

Clinton's chief of staff calls White House over vandalism reports

Gephardt talks bipartisanship, outlines differences

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

India tends to quake survivors

Two Oklahoma State players among 10 killed in plane crash

Sharon calls peace talks a campaign ploy by Barak

Police arrest 100 Davos protesters

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

LAW

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

HEALTH

TRAVEL

FOOD

Texas cattle quarantined after violation of mad-cow feed ban
ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image


Bill Press: Don't be fooled. Rick Lazio is not pro-choice

Press

June 5, 2000
Web posted at: 1:59 PM EDT (1759 GMT)

It’s only June, but Rick Lazio must think it’s already Halloween. He’s so giddy to be in Rudy’s shoes, he’s now running around New York State wearing a mask, calling himself a moderate and pretending to be pro-choice.

Don’t be fooled. Check his record. Rick Lazio is not pro-choice.

Yes, Lazio supports Roe v. Wade, in principle. That means he’s more moderate on abortion than, say, Pat Robertson -- but he's still a long way from being a strong supporter of a woman’s right to choose.

According to the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), in eight years in Congress, Lazio has voted on abortion and reproductive rights issues 94 times. Some 43 were anti-choice votes -- granted, better than many Republicans, but still not good enough.

But it’s not just the number of his anti-choice votes that counts, it’s their significance.

Here are just three examples. As a self-described moderate, Lazio:

-- Voted to ban privately-funded abortions at overseas military hospitals for U.S. servicewomen and military dependents, except in cases of rape or incest.

-- Voted to ban abortions for women in federal prisons, except in cases of life endangerment or rape. And....

-- Voted to ban Medicaid coverage for abortion, except in cases of life endangerment, rape or incest.

It’s that last vote, in favor of the so-called Hyde amendment, that is most troubling and puts the lie to Lazio’s phony claim to be pro-choice. By denying Medicaid funding for abortion (with three classic exceptions), the Hyde amendment says that all women have a right to choose to have an abortion -- as long as they can pay for it themselves. Poor women, who cannot afford an abortion, simply don’t have the same rights as richer women.

How do Lazio’s supporters defend that vote? They don’t. Instead, they change the subject. Don’t believe me? Check the CNN online transcripts for Crossfire on May 26 and Inside Politics on May 30.

On Friday, May 26, I asked Rep. Tom Reynolds, Lazio’s campaign chair, whether claiming to be pro-choice while voting for the Hyde amendment was a lie. Reynolds: “No, I think the congressman said it as he sees it. He’s a pro-choice Republican. He is opposed to partial-birth abortion and has publicly said that.”

On Tuesday, May 30, Judy Woodruff asked New York Gov. George Pataki how he could explain Lazio’s vote to cut funding for poor women seeking abortions. After suggesting opponents are distorting one vote, Pataki argues: “If you take a look at his record on the environment, on health care issues, on what he’s done for the disabled, on his commitment to education, I think people are going to say Rick Lazio’s been an outstanding member of Congress for all the people of New York.”

See the pattern? When asked about the Hyde amendment, talk about partial-birth abortion. Talk about education. Talk about the environment. Talk about health care. Talk about anything BUT the Hyde amendment. And no wonder. Because they simply cannot defend it.

Pretending to affirm a woman’s right to choose, while denying that right to poor women, is hypocritical, unconstitutional, un-American -- and definitely un-choice. There is no way you can be both pro-choice and pro-Hyde amendment.

Granted, abortion will not be the only issue in the New York Senate race, but it is one where there is a clear difference between Rick Lazio and Hillary Clinton. And an important one.

Last year, 47 senators voted against a non-binding, "sense of the Congress" resolution that deemed the Roe v. Wade decision "appropriate," and said it should not be overturned. Both of New York’s senators voted in favor of the resolution. That shows how close the margin on abortion is in the Senate, how close American women could be to losing their constitutional right of privacy, and how important it is that New Yorkers elect as their next senator a person who is unequivocally pro-choice.

That choice is clear. When it comes to pro-choice, Rick Lazio is anything but.

 
ELECTION 2000


CALENDAR
See how quickly the primary and caucus season will take off with this calendar.


VIDEO
Watch selected policy speeches and campaign commercials from the major presidential candidates.


WHAT'S AT STAKE


CANDIDATE BIOS
Quick takes on the White House hopefuls.


RACES
If you need to know who's up in 1999 or 2000 and what seats are open launch this quick guide.


THE STATES
Who are your elected officials? What is the past presidential vote and number of electoral votes in your state? Find out with these state political and election facts.


POLLS
Check out the latest numbers or dig back into the poll archives.


E-MAIL UPDATES
Receive news about a candidate by e-mail.

Your e-mail address: Mind-it Button


WHO'S IN-WHO'S OUT
Who is running, who isn't running and who has already dropped out? Check out our tally sheet.


FOLLOW THE MONEY
How much money have the candidates raised? Here are their quarterly reports to the Federal Election Commission.


MESSAGE BOARDS



MORE STORIES:

Monday, June 5, 2000


 Search   

Back to the top  © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.