|
|
JULY 17, 2000 VOL. 156 NO. 2
VIEWPOINT
Solving
the Tibetan Problem
Before
it's too late, China and the Dalai Lama must reach a compromise
By TSERING SHAKYA
 |

Stephen
Dupont/ Contact Press Images for TIME.
In Gansu province, ethnic Tibetan schoolchildren learn their lessons
in Chinese.
|
Tibet
is everywhere these days. Its images are used to sell insurance; the Dalai
Lama's face appears on billboards to promote computers; there are countless
Tibetan festivals and exhibitions. But Tibet as an issue in global politics
has gone nowhere.
China's leaders lose no sleep over Tibet. They have invested huge amounts
of money to improve internal security, making it almost impossible for
Tibetans to stage any kind of protest. (Torture and imprisonment inevitably
follow any such attempt.) The flight of the 17th Karmapa to India embarrassed
China's leaders, providing them with further evidence of what they see
as the Dalai Lama's "intrigue" and "insincerity." As a consequence, contact
between Beijing and the Dalai Lama has been cut, effectively ending any
hope of a negotiated settlement.
Within Tibet the political situation has worsened. The campaigns against
the Dalai Lama, his so-called "splittist" followers and religious activities
continue. The neighborhood committee meetings are as intense as those
during the Cultural Revolution. In March at a meeting of China's National
People's Congress, Zhou Yongkang, the Communist Party secretary for Sichuan
province (which incorporates large parts of eastern Tibet), announced
that the teaching of Tibetan in schools was a drain on government resources.
The flight of the Karmapa and other senior religious leaders and the continual
flow of Tibetans over the Himalayas to Nepal and India constitute clear
proof of China's failure to win over Tibetans. China has not learned from
the Cultural Revolution, the most violent period in Tibetan and Chinese
history. The people's religious faith was not even dented, and when the
party partially relaxed its control, Tibetan Buddhism rebounded with a
vitality that shook the authorities. The party can coerce Tibetans, but
it cannot win their hearts and minds. Only a wise and tolerant policy
can do that.
 |
ALSO IN TIME
|
|
|
|
The
Chinese are confident about their rule in Tibet: they know that however
much Tibetans might protest, neither the Dalai Lama nor the Tibetans themselves
have the power to dislodge them. Given Beijing's intransigence and the
failure of the Tibetan government-in-exile to arouse the people, China's
lack of interest in a negotiated settlement has left the Tibetans hopeless
and dejected. Their depression has been further deepened by the Dalai
Lama's public statements that he has done his best to find a solution
but has so far failed. Among the Tibetan refugee community there is a
sense of despair about ever returning to the homeland. An increasing number
of Tibetans are looking overseas, especially to the United States, for
their salvation. Prospects of a bleak future are driving hundreds of young
Tibetans to the West, where they often end up washing dishes in New York,
London or Paris.
Hope that international pressure on China could bring change remains unfulfilled.
Despite growing popular support for the Tibetan cause in the West, there
are no signs that governments are willing to take up the cause in earnest.
The Tibetan problem lies at the bottom of the heap. And it is likely to
remain there for the simple reason that Tibet has no economic or strategic
value for Western governments, and China is not a country that can be
bullied. It's not that Beijing is immune to international persuasionthere
simply is no concerted pressure on China to relent on Tibet.
The gulf between the Dalai Lama and the Chinese leadership is not insurmountable.
A solution can be reached that meets Beijing's security concerns and gives
Tibetans a homeland. However, it will require courageous and imaginative
decisions on both sides. Deng Xiaoping's bold "one country, two systems"
policy has gone a long way in meeting China's claim to sovereignty while
leaving people in other parts of the country to run their own affairs.
If Beijing insists that it will talk with the Dalai Lama only in person,
refusing to recognize officials appointed by him, he should be prepared
to meet with China's leaders. The Dalai Lama has declared he does not
want independence for Tibet and is willing to meet Beijing's security
concerns by agreeing to relinquish control of foreign and defense policy
to China. Beijing in return should recognize that by giving Tibet genuine
autonomy its security and status in the world will not be endangered.
If anything it will be enhanced.
Tsering Shakya is the author of The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A
History of Modern Tibet Since 1947
Write to TIME at mail@web.timeasia.com
This
edition's table of contents
TIME Asia home
Quick Scroll: More stories from TIME, Asiaweek and CNN
|